Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of GenshiPerformance

Timestamp:

Jul 15, 2006, 1:53:24 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

cmlenz

Comment:

Fix Kid URLs

GenshiPerformance

@@ -13 +13 @@
 || [http://www.clearsilver.net/ Clearsilver] || 0.33 ms || !ClearSilver is a text-based template engine written in C. ||
 || [http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/templates/ Django] || 1.84 ms || Text-based template engine that comes with the [http://www.djangoproject.com/ Django] framework. ||
-|| [http://kid.lesscode.org/ Kid] || 5.66 ms || Kid templates are compiled to Python byte-code. The cElementTree implementation was used for this test, although using the Python implementation doesn't appear to make a significant difference. ||
+|| [http://kid-templating.org/ Kid] || 5.66 ms || Kid templates are compiled to Python byte-code. The cElementTree implementation was used for this test, although using the Python implementation doesn't appear to make a significant difference. ||
 || [http://www.owlfish.com/software/simpleTAL/ SimpleTAL] || 2.07 ms || Another XML-based template engine written in Python, based on the [http://www.zope.org/ Zope] template engine (TAL). ''The template is a bit simpler than the other ones, due to me not being able to figure out how to do conditional attributes. ||
 
@@ -24 +24 @@
 || '''Template Engine''' || '''Rendering time (less is better)''' ||
 || Markup || 3.67 ms ||
-|| [http://kid.lesscode.org/ Kid] || 9.45 ms ||
+|| [http://kid-templating.org/ Kid] || 9.45 ms ||
 
 I'm not quite sure why the difference between Markup and Kid is so much more drastic in this example compared to the above. It does define more (and slightly more sophisticated) match templates, which would suggest that Markup implements those more efficiently. However, that's just a theory.