= In search of a better name for Markup = Many people have commented that “Markup” is a bad name for a project, mainly because it's very difficult to search for using Google et al. This page should serve to collect the various name suggestions. == “pyMarkup” == Suggested by Christian Boos [http://groups.google.com/group/markup-discuss/browse_thread/thread/b9d4cb7fcdd08072 here]: > pyMarkup? > > Pretty standard for a Python library to have a "py" prefix, and you > don't really give up the Markup name. > Also, would be pretty straightforward to top google results for it (54 > hits so far...). In response to: >Response by [http://www.cmlenz.net/ Christopher Lenz]: > >> I'm not a fan of such prefixed names (!WinFoo, KFoo, GFoo, iFoo, etc). >> IMHO those fall in the "cheesy" category ;-) >> Exceptions are bindings or Python versions of some product, but >> otherwise I think it's rather ugly. Yes, ''pySomething'' usually stands for the Python bindings for that ''Something''. In the context of Markup, it was more meant to be reminiscent of the `py:` prefix we use everywhere in our templates. So maybe... py:markup? Additionally, this goes well with the encapsulation in <...> illustrated in the logo. == “Markhor” == See [http://groups.google.com/group/markup-discuss/browse_thread/thread/b9d4cb7fcdd08072 this post] by [http://matt-good.net/ Matt Good] to the [MailingList mailing list]: > In relation to the "Goat" suggestion Chris mentioned on IRC "Markhor" > which is a type of goat. Incidentally the name comes from the Persian > word for "snake eater", so it has a sort-of tie-in to Python. Though > as Christian later that O'Reilly is using wild goats on its covers for > Ruby on Rails-related books: > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/rubyrails/ ''In this context, “Goat” was proposed on the thread by Ethan Fremen (“what happens to a kid when it grows up :)“.)'' ''Well, I was actually refering to [http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/ruby/cover.html Ruby in a Nutshell], but it appears it's the same goat ;)... -- Christian'' == “Upmark” == "upmark" - Suggested by David Fraser == “Papyrus” == Suggested by [http://www.sylvantech.com/~talin/ Talin] via email: > On the naming issue, I have a suggestion: "Papyrus". Now - one > would think that there ''must'' already be a Python project with > that name, it's so bleeding obvious - but a Google search for > "python papyrus" turns up nothing relevant. So my suggestion > is - grab the name while you can :) ---- == About the '''' Logo == I like the current logo, however I thought about a small twist that would make it look even better: use a "!" instead of "/". That makes it more "dynamic". HTML prototype: [[html(<markup!>)]] The "!" could even be interpreted as: "yeah, the name is ''markup''! despite all what people are saying about its googlability and other neologisms..." ;) HTML prototype for py:markup: [[html(<py:markup!>)]]